Sex Wars: In Defense of Feminist Porn
Reading into Andrea Dworkin’s array of works on radical
feminism[1] reminds me of that time I
was scolded by my mom for having sexual urges; as if I was to be blamed for the
way my body works. As if it was unnatural for women to want to have sex. I was
probably four when my mom first caught me rocking on my tricycle seat, back and
forth, trying to generate more from the strange pleasure of rubbing my genital
against something. She pulled me off my tricycle abruptly and proceeded to sit
me in front of her. Here came her first reprimand on how what I was doing was
absolutely disgusting, shameful, and most importantly worthy of sin from God. Without
any coherence of reasoning, she simply stated that touching my vagina is
unacceptable. The 4 year old me was understandably confused and scared of the
threat in her voice and decided to never do it again(or even if I did, it was never
to be found out by her). Later when I entered adolescence she tried to address
it again. This time acknowledging that masturbation indeed produce pleasure but
women are not to acquire it themselves, vagina and its virginity is literally
“the only precious gift a wife can offer to man who wed her” and I was
“supposed to keep it intact for my future husband or else I wouldn’t be worthy
of any”. She insinuated that indulging in porn and embracing sexuality in
general is inappropriate for women.
Born and
raised in a conservative Muslim and Javanese family herself, what she did was
expected. It was patriarchy who made her demonizing women who indulge in sexual
pleasure because men are somehow more entitled to it than us, believing the
notion that even our vaginal functions belong to men. However, to hear the
similar tones of judgment, reprimanding, and demonization –even though
they come with slightly different reasoning– of women who simply
accepts their bodily functions of wanting to indulge in sex from feminist
scholars like Dworkin or Catharine MacKinnon is problematic. This demonization creates
harms where women are shamed for simply fulfilling their natural urges,
sometimes resulting into irreversible psychological harms like destructive
self-hatred for women or women leaving feminism altogether. In this essay I am
going to argue that the emergence of feminist porn and the notion that
encourage women to explore their sexuality should be embraced by feminist movement not
only because in principle, it fulfills the very purpose of feminism but also
creates two important benefits for women; personal empowerments and necessary
education to develop their sexuality.
Before that, I need to characterize the parameters of what
constitute as feminist porn. Feminist pornography refers to a genre of film
developed by and/or for those dedicated to gender equality. It was created for
the purposes of encouraging women and their self-beliefs of freedom through
sexuality, equality and pleasure.[2] This type of porn put
women as the agent or subject of the sexual act directly contrasting the usual
portrayal of women as object in mainstream porn. It can be produced in a form
of movies, novels, even fanfictions. Feminist porn movies typically involve
more elaborate plot as opposed to simply portraying the sexual act. Feminist
pornography ensures women’s pleasure and the wellbeing of women working in the
industry. That is to say, feminist porn has to guarantee proper working
conditions, consent, minimum wage, fair contract, and conduct its production in
a non-exploitative way. This characterization is important so that opponents of
pornography can no longer argue on the basis of direct and non-consensual
violence women may receive from the industry because that’s not the type of
porn I am endorsing in this essay as they are inherently exploitative.
First of all, the purpose of feminism is to free women out
of patriarchal prison that limits their freedom of expression and deprives them
of their own self-autonomy. Embracing feminist porn fulfills this ideal. Dorothy
Allison in her book, Pleasure and Danger talks
about the deep shame women often feel about their own sexuality, especially if
it deviates from dominant norms.[3] Why should feminism
heighten that shame by standing in judgment of women’s most intimate desire? Most
of anti- feminist porn still uses Dworkin’s extreme argumentation that contends
in light of society’s pervasive sexism, women cannot freely consent to sexual
intercourse and porn industry that commodifies it[4]. Opposing feminist porn on
the basis that woman will always be exploited no matter how educated she is or
how much improvement the working condition in feminist porn industry has
gained, is grossly assumptive. To assume that women are not capable in giving
meaningful consent in relation to sexual acts because they don’t realize they
are being exploited is highly offensive. To simply assume women are not
rational enough to reason when they make the decision to indulge in porn
industry highly mimics the patriarchal notions that women is inherently
incapable of being rational thus need other to make the decision for them. Feminism
requires not a fixed set of choices but rather acting with what is called a
“feminist consciousness,” defined as “knowledge of what one is doing and why
one is doing it”.[5]
As long as women are conscious and informed, her consent to indulge in porn or
any sexual activities should be valid and considered as feminist actions.
Second of all, opposing feminist porn perpetuates the
disempowering notion that women are essentially victims, thus hampering women’s
individual empowerment. As anti- feminist porn movement views women as
inevitably being victims in sexual matters, that movement also perpetuates
stereotype that women are victims in more general sense. Growing numbers of
feminists are starting to recognize that while giving victimhood to women may be
beneficial, it can backfire against gender equality.[6] Although mainstream porn
typically contains misogynist imagery about women, feminist porn contains
positive images. Feminist writer Ann Snitow describes some of these positive
facets of pornographic imagery: “Pornography
sometimes includes elements of play, as if the fear women feel toward men had
evaporated and women were relaxed and willing at last. Such a fantasy-sexual
revolution as fait accompli can be wishful, eager and utopian. Porn can depict thrilling
(as opposed to threatening) danger.. some of its manic quality ... seems
propelled by fear and joy about breaching the always uncertain boundaries of
flesh and personality.“[7]
The anti-porn narratives that describe porn as as violent,
degrading, and harmful to women and society ignore the diverse ways that women
actually interact with it. Sexuality and sexual relationship are individualized
to the most intimate and personal aspect of one’s life. One’s interpretation
and reaction to sexually explicit expression are also subjective. Pornography
that one women views as misogynistic can also be viewed by another as
reaffirming their desires and equality that both men and women deserve pleasure
out of sexual relationship. Even with scenes where male appears to be
dominating over female, some women can actually find empowerment through what
appears to be demeaning acts, case in point sadomasochism genre. Women may find
sense of power in their ability to delegate control over their body to someone
else, knowing full well that she is the one who owns and control that very
decision.
Female sex workers may see their profession through
different perspective. Rejecting the label of “victim”, they propose
alternative view of feminism that emphasizes their right to pursue their own
desire. As one states, “ We have been out
there doing our own thing, fighting all the fights that you possibly can to be
females in any way we choose and that’s our right and our power. We were doing
it long before the feminist come in and started picketing clubs saying that we
were exploiting ourselves.”[8] She argues that feminism
is about “personal empowerment,” and
“the choice to be a stripper,” she
insists is “personally empowering.”[9]
What can be more empowering for women than having the ability to pursue our
sexual desire, understanding that sexuality is the very aspect of our life that
has been suppressed by patriarchy for so long?
Statement above is in line with third-wave feminism that
reintroduces sexual liberation into feminist discourse. According to Leslie Heywood, the new movement not
only defends pornography, sex works, sadomasochism, and butch/femme roles, but
it also recuperates heterosexuality, intercourse, marriage, and sex toys from
separatist feminist dismissals.[10] Third-wave feminism
strives to be more inclusive and non-judgmental toward women from diverse
background of race, religion, sexual orientation, and other forms of identity.
Third-wave feminist try to also accommodate intersectional oppression faced by
women in effort to avoid totalizing and stereotyping women. Commonly referred
to as “choice feminism”, this branch tries to uphold women’s choices as long as
they were not made under duress, providing that they were made under “feminist
consciousness.”
Third of
all, opposing feminist porn would harm women’s effort to develop their own
sexuality. It will deprive them of a platform to explore their sexuality in a
healthy and safe manner. Throughout history, opponents of women’s rights have tried
to limit the production and dissemination of information about women’s
sexuality.[11]
For young women like me, information may not be the most important thing about
porn, but porn is important because of its sexual parameters, the bounds of the
normal, and provides not only reassurance but permission to be sexual.[12] In that sense, I was no
longer forced to suppress my nature to desire sexual activities. Exposure to
sex positive, third-wave feminism liberates me from patriarchal narratives that
has prevented me from opening more doors to sexual exploration. From societal
norms that prevent me from finding out what I like, what I don’t like, and be
vocal about them. Without supporting women’s pursuit of sexuality, we deny
women of their womanhood.
By opposing feminist porn, this will resemble the efforts
done by Dworkin’s right-wing allies to deny women of information and confidence
important in developing their own sense of sexual and gender-role identity. Banning
feminist pornography would also stifle discussions and expression not only by
porn enthusiast but also female artist. Identical to what one woman artist once
stated, "Censorship (of porn) can
only accentuate the taboos that already surround women's open exploration of
their sexuality. There are too many other obstacles now in place to women
becoming artists or writers, or even speaking out publicly, without inviting the
judicial control of censoring pornography.”[13]
It is also worth noting that science has confirmed that
desire to use one’s body parts for pleasure is part of normal sexual
development, even among children. To have a positive self-image, enjoying one’s
body parts contributes to developing healthy sexuality and liking one’s body.[14] For most kids, it’s a
continuing discovery and it feels good. It’s as simple as that. Feminist should
not in any way condemning pursuit of healthy pleasure through feminist porn for
female adult as part of this process. If we oppose feminist porn and pursuit of
women’s pleasure in general, what difference do we have from patriarchal
parents who demonize their daughters for innocently discovering pleasure from
touching their genitals?
In conclusion, feminist
porn is principally in line with the ideals of feminism to empower woman in
making their own choices and liberating women from patriarchal oppression.
Radical feminists who opposes pornography on the basis that it degrades women
are backlashing this ideals because they condone patriarchal notions that women
lacks the capacity in making rational decisions and meaningful consent.
Supporting feminist porn is also feminist because it creates subjective
empowerment needed for women whose sexual needs and wants are suppressed by
their society and creating a safe platform for women who wants to develop and
further explore their sexuality.
WORKS CITED
BOOKS
Allison,
Dorothy.1989. Public Silence, Private Terror. In Pleasure and Danger :
Exploring Female Sexuality, ed. Carole S. Vance. London: Pandora.
Baumgardner,
Jennifer, and Amy Richards. 2000. Manifesta : Young Women, Feminism, and the
Future. New York : Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Bell,
Laurie, ed. 1987. Good Girls/Bad Girls: Feminists and Sex Trade Workers Face to
Face. Toronto: The Seal Press
Dworkin,
Andrea. 1981 [1979]. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women’s
Press.
_______.
2006 [1987]. Intercourse. New York : Basic Books.
Gronau,
Anna. 1985. Women and Images: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Censorship, in
Women Against Censorship, edited by Varda Burstyn. Vancouver and Toronto :
Douglas & McIntyre.
Heywood,
Leslie L. 2006. The Women's Movement Today: An Encyclopedia of Third Wave
Feminism, Vol ume 1: A-Z. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Snitow,
Ann. 1985. Retrenchment Versus Transformation: The Politics of the
Anti-Pornography movement, in Women Against Censorship, edited by Varda
Burstyn. Vancouver and Toronto : Douglas & McIntyre.
JOURNALS AND OTHERS
Lewin,
Tamar. 1992. Feminists Wonder if It Was
Progress to Become "Victims," N.Y. Times, May 10, at D6.
Snyder-Hall,
R. Claire. 2010. Third-wave feminism and the defense of "choice".
Perspectives on Politics. Cambridge Journals. Vol. 8, No. 1 : 255–261.
Strossen,
Nadine. 1993. A Feminist Critique of "the" Feminist Critique of
Pornography. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 79, No. 5 : 1099-1190
Tisdale,
Sallie. 1992. Talk Dirty to Me: A Woman's Taste for Pornography, Harpers Mag.,
Feb, at 37, 39
[1]
Dworkin 1981 [1979], 200
She argued that “Male power is the raison d’etre of
pornography; the degradation of the female is the means of achieving this
power…that women are inhibited or have a low sex drive or do not want or need
sex…is a recognition, however perverse, that no one could possibly like or want
what men do to women.” Despite her
claimed disapproval for the idea that women do not like sex, Dworkin believes
that women should not like sex. This black-and-white narrative endorsed by
Dworkin ignores women’s agency and demands all women to conform to a very specific
idea of female behavior which resembles what patriarchy has done to women for
decades.
Dworkin 2006 [1987], 155 – 156
She argued that sexual “Intercourse
in reality is a use and an abuse simultaneously…There is no analogue anywhere
among subordinate groups of people to this experience of being made for
intercourse: for penetration, entry, occupation…Intercourse is a particular
reality for women an an inferior class; and it has in it, as part of it,
violation of boundaries, taking over, occupation, destruction of privacy”. Aside from portraying the sexual practices of
the vast majority of women as anti-feminist, but her generalizations and
totalizing language appears to give no rooms of interpretations of heterosexual
relations.
[2] Snyder-Hall
2010, 255–261
[3]
Allison 1989, 108.
[4] Dworkin
2006 [1987], 155 – 156
[5]
Baumgardner and Richards 2000, 83.
[6]
Lewin 1992
“On issues from domestic violence to pornography, feminists are
rethinking their emphasis on women as victims-and looking for new legal and
political approaches to enable women to force social change. Fifteen years ago,
Elizabeth Schneider helped develop the legal argument that battered women who
killed husbands who had abused them for years were the victims, not the
aggressors. Now she worries [that] battered women are victims of their victim
status. [She said:] "Courts and society have glommed onto the victim
image.... But it's a two-edged sword. Many battered women lose custody of their
children because judges see them as helpless, paralyzed victims who can't
manage daily life. And if a woman seems too capable, too much in charge of her
life to fit the victim image, she may not be”
[7]
Snitow 1985, 107-120
[8]
Bell 1987, 195
[9]
Ibid., 190
[10]
Heywood, 2006, 260
[11]
Strossen 1993, 74
[12]
Tisdale 1992, 39
[13]
Gronau 1985, 91
[14] Masturbation:
Six Ways to Manage It. (n.d.). Retrieved June 4, 2017, from
https://www.askdrsears.com/topics/parenting/child-rearing-and-development/sexuality/masturbation-six-ways-manage-it
**Artwoks' credit goes to one of my favorite French artists, petite luxures.
**Artwoks' credit goes to one of my favorite French artists, petite luxures.
Comments
Post a Comment